subprocess-run-without-check (PLW1510)
Added in v0.0.285 · Related issues · View source
Derived from the Pylint linter.
Fix is sometimes available.
What it does
Checks for uses of subprocess.run without an explicit check argument.
Why is this bad?
By default, subprocess.run does not check the return code of the process
it runs. This can lead to silent failures.
Instead, consider using check=True to raise an exception if the process
fails, or set check=False explicitly to mark the behavior as intentional.
Example
Use instead:
Or:
Fix safety
This rule's fix is marked as display-only because it's not clear whether the
potential exception was meant to be ignored by setting check=False or if
the author simply forgot to include check=True. The fix adds
check=False, making the existing behavior explicit but possibly masking
the original intention.