convert-named-tuple-functional-to-class (UP014)
Added in v0.0.155 · Related issues · View source
Derived from the pyupgrade linter.
Fix is sometimes available.
What it does
Checks for NamedTuple declarations that use functional syntax.
Why is this bad?
NamedTuple subclasses can be defined either through a functional syntax
(Foo = NamedTuple(...)) or a class syntax (class Foo(NamedTuple): ...).
The class syntax is more readable and generally preferred over the
functional syntax, which exists primarily for backwards compatibility
with collections.namedtuple.
Example
Use instead:
Fix safety
This rule's fix is marked as unsafe if there are any comments within the
range of the NamedTuple definition, as these will be dropped by the
autofix.